I’ve been thinking lately about the gap between “executive presence” and what I understand to be “presence” – the kind I often discuss in my posts. And I wondered if there is an illusion of executive presence? It’s a distinction that feels increasingly relevant in today’s leadership landscape.

Traditional “executive presence” seems to prioritise external markers: gravitas, a polished communication style and a certain appearance. It’s about projecting an image, fitting into a mould. But what if that mould is actually a distraction?

My understanding of presence comes from a place of inner stillness. It’s not about adding layers of performance, it’s about recognising what’s already there. It’s about recognising that inner stillness, that inner calm, that inner confidence. Pure awareness.

Real presence isn’t constructed from a checklist of external attributes. It’s not about perfecting a persona or trying to be someone you’re not. It’s about allowing that inner stillness to be the guiding force behind your actions.

When you operate from this place of genuine presence, you lead with clarity and authenticity. There’s a different kind of strength that emerges, one that resonates deeply with others. It’s a strength that doesn’t need to shout, dominate or perform.

Perhaps we’ve been looking at leadership through the wrong lens. Perhaps true influence comes not from mastering outward displays, but from cultivating an inner state of being. It’s a subtle shift, but one that can change the way we lead and connect.

What are your thoughts on this distinction? How do you cultivate authentic presence in your own life?

Also connect with me on LinkedIn.