In my previous post I wrote about the differences between coaching and mentoring. Another differentiation that is important is therapy.

Coaching is not therapy, therapy is not coaching.

The fundamental principle of coaching is that we can address any topic that the client feels empowered to work on. This means focusing on areas where they have the motivation, energy, and willingness to tackle challenges

But, do I agree with this approach? Usually yes, but it needs to be looked at from case to case. I think it’s crucial to be responsible as a coach and to differentiate what work we take on, and which kind of work to hand over to other professionals.

It is not intended to address issues that have manifested in a medical context.

So how do I know when to say yes to work and when to decline it? It’s essential to have a discovery call before signing up for coaching sessions. This call allows to get to know each other but also to figure out what the topic is the client wants to work on.

As a general rule I want to work with clients who have a specific goal, that can achieved in a specified time frame.